If you want perfection, hire a robot. But make sure their code has been de-bugged first.
If you want someone who is human with other humans, hire a human. But make sure their brain has been de-bugged first.
Make sure the human has adequate sleep and nutrition and emotional support and intelligence and wherewithal to interact with the healthcare system to the degree of success they need in order to access their high-powered pharmaceuticals to support “daily functioning.”
Make sure the robot has adequate oil and power and programming and anything else robots might need to support “daily functioning.”
Interesting to think about the jobs that may or may not be best suited to AI perfection vs empathetic human interaction.
Interesting to think: if we perfect robot skin-casing enough to simulate a smile, and we invent a way of injecting each human with love-bonding oxytocin for every human-robot interaction, would we even miss human-to-human connection?
What is the point of other humans at all, if every human need is performed to a higher degree of satisfaction, with less errors, with a robot surrogate replacement?
customer service
restaurant work
surgery
orgasms
if a robot is “better” at the job (whatever the job is), what is the point of other humans at all?
Something I’m thinking about today, at the end of a long day working as a server in a restaurant, in which my reviews from the customers are extremely high, but in which management thinks my performance leaves much to be desired. My restaurant-worker algorithm needs some de-bugging. But my sensing-what-other-humans-need-emotionally algorithm? I’ve got that one down to a science.